Sportsgrid Icon
Live NowLive
DIRECTV Image
Samsung TV Plus Image
Roku TV Image
Amazon Prime Video Image
FireTV Image
LG Channels Image
Vizio Image
Xiaomi Image
YouTube TV Image
FuboTV Image
Plex Image
Sling Tv Image
VIDAA Image
TCL Image
FreeCast Image
Local Now Image
Sports.Tv Image
Stremium Image
Rad TV Image
Free Live Sports Image
YouTube Image
NCAAB · 7 hours ago

Understanding THE NCAA Tournament: Miami (OH) selection criteria!

Kevin Walsh

Kevin Walsh

Host · Writer

Understanding THE NCAA Tournament: Miami (OH) selection criteria!

Segment Spotlight: Quick Hits From College Basketball Today

Analyzing College Basketball Team Rankings and Tournament Prospects

In addressing concerns about the legitimacy of certain teams’ claims to a spot in the college basketball tournament, recent statistics from key ranking systems such as KenPom and the NET were discussed, presenting a clear and factual account. Teams such as Gonzaga, Saint Mary's, and Saint Louis have clearly distinguished themselves based on KenPom rankings, asserting their positions well within the top tiers. Specifically, Gonzaga is notably placed 11th, Saint Mary's at 22nd, and Saint Louis at 31st, proving that quality transcends conference boundaries.

Furthermore, the KenPom rankings contradicted any biases against teams from mid-major conferences, directly disproving common misconceptions. For instance, Akron ranks 60th, showcasing that it is not about conference clout, as commonly believed. Importantly, Miami of Ohio’s ranking at 90th reflects challenges in their performance such as playing an easier schedule and lesser winning margins, rather than institutional biases presumed by affiliation.

Shifting focus to the NET rankings, the narrative slightly changes, not as stark but still significant, with different insights into team performance. For example, UCF and South Florida are very closely ranked at 49th and 50th, respectively. Meanwhile, Miami of Ohio stands at 53rd in NET rankings, reinforcing the objective assessment of their game, but also underlining the scrutiny they face being from a mid-major conference. Furthermore, teams like Baylor and Seton Hall also come into the spotlight, contextualizing the rankings within a broader competitive scenario.

The discussion brought forward an important reminder: the conversation about team qualifications and rankings is driven by performance metrics and not merely conference affiliations or historical biases against mid-major teams. This helps in ensuring a fair evaluation in the lead-up to the tournament selections.

)