Sportsgrid Icon
Live NowLive
DIRECTV Image
Samsung TV Plus Image
Roku TV Image
Amazon Prime Video Image
FireTV Image
LG Channels Image
Vizio Image
Xiaomi Image
YouTube TV Image
FuboTV Image
Plex Image
Sling Tv Image
TCL Image
FreeCast Image
Sports.Tv Image
Stremium Image
Free Live Sports Image
YouTube Image
NCAAB · 3 hours ago

Duke vs. St. John's Sweet 16 Thriller: Key Takeaways

Kevin Walsh

Kevin Walsh

Host · Writer

Duke vs. St. John's Sweet 16 Thriller: Key Takeaways

Segment Spotlight: Quick Hits From College Basketball Today

Duke's Tactical Shift and Saint John's Near Miss in the Sweet 16

The Duke-Saint John's game, one of the Sweet 16's most anticipated matchups, certainly lived up to the hype according to expectations. Despite Duke clinching the win and the game going over the total, it ended with Duke failing to cover the spread. The standout performance was from Ruben Prey, making four three-pointers in the first half but notably absent in the second.

Rick Pitino's decision not to play Prey in the latter half raised questions, especially as two key players, Dylan Mitchell and Bryce Hopkins, were in foul trouble early on but improved later in the game. The critical juncture for Saint John's was both offensive and defensive mishaps. Ian Jack Jackson's questionable shot selection disrupted the team's rhythm offensively.

On the defensive end, Coach John Shire of Duke simplified his strategy, utilizing high ball screens set by Boozer, which enabled guards like Foster and Evans to penetrate effectively. Pitino tried adjusting by switching on defense and using Boozer in varied roles, but couldn't contain Duke’s structured play, highlighted by the effective high ball screens.

The game's pace echoed a strategy reminiscent of classic Kentucky plays, aiming to accelerate the game dramatically. Once Duke adapted to this intensity around the mid-second half, they strategically controlled the game’s tempo, successfully navigating past Saint John's press.

Isaiah Evans also stood out, delivering an impressive performance that highlighted his potential as a future draft pick, though he displayed inconsistency throughout the season. His performance was critical, but whether this level of play will extend into the upcoming games remains a question.

As the tournament progresses, Duke's further successes could significantly affect perceptions of their capability to claim the national championship, particularly given some doubts about the team’s overall depth and reliance on Boozer's exceptional form.

)